The impulse to create a review is often the need to express one’s attitude towards what has been read. This is a way to understand your impression caused by the book, on the basis of elementary knowledge in the theory of literature and a detailed analysis of the work. It also helps other readers to learn something about the new author and books that have catch attention. The goal of the reviewer is to act rationally, logically and emotionally on the reader. Therefore, the reviewer uses language tools that combine the functions of naming and evaluation, book and colloquial words and constructions. The reviewer must carefully substantiate his opinion with the use of an analysis, including arguments.
There are several rules for writing a good book review. Firstly, you do not need to make a detailed retelling. After that it will be uninteresting to read the book itself. One of the criteria for a weak review is rightly considered substitution of analysis and interpretation of the text by retelling it.
Secondly, you need to disclose your understanding of the title of the book. Every familiarization with a new book begins with a title, which you interpret in the process of reading. The name of a good work is always multivalued; it is a kind of symbol, a metaphor.
Thirdly, an analysis of the composition can give much for understanding and interpreting the text. You should think which compositional techniques (antithesis, hyperbola, etc.) are used in the work. This will help to penetrate the author’s intention. Think about which parts you can divide the text into and how they are arranged.
And the last advice – it is important to evaluate the style, originality of the writer, to disassemble the images, the artistic techniques that he uses in his work. Also, you should find the zest of this writer. Why his style is individual and unique. These rules will be the key to a successful writing of the review. But remember that the review is not necessarily the presence of all of the above components. The most important thing is that the review must be interesting and grammatically correct.