Custom Annotated Bibliography Online, MLA, APA Style

Each task has its own goal, to open some sides of the student, to check someone’s possibilities, to find the depth which wasn’t seen till that moment. Annotated bibliography is to prove you can continue working with all your concentration when your work is almost done.
Really, we see annotations in the majority of serious works we read. Serious works can’t be done by unserious people, so here we find sense. Bibliography annotating is considered to be the very important skill one would need and use in future. It is such type of writing, which follows almost all the researches or other written projects. When working on something, it’s not usually enough to make your own experiments or practice, though it’s needed, too. You should look at the chosen subject from all the possible sides and points to make sure you know what you’re talking about. It means that some moment you’ll rely on the authority’s mind. Sometimes it’s impossible to avoid using some scientific literature or sources, which prove the point you follow.
Annotations are to make your work more respectful. Readers will see what base your writing has, so they can decide it is worth reading or not. Annotated bibliography is rather painstaking job to do, it isn’t a secret. Sometimes you feel that you cannot or don’t want to waste your time doing this. Nothing good can come out without desire and it’s been proved. Maybe, custom writing services will be the solution here. Really, 24/7 available professional online writers, who have surely done such tasks before won’t make you the only exception. Always full or desire and experienced they know how to deal with such kind of writing. Annotated bibliography has its own specific structure one has to get used to. It’s not like to list all the helpful sources, but to do it according to demanded form. It’s something you can learn, but to escape the deadline-pushing-effect and stress, just know – writing services can handle it all whenever you’ll need them!

Book review writing service

The impulse to create a review is often the need to express one’s attitude towards what has been read. This is a way to understand your impression caused by the book, on the basis of elementary knowledge in the theory of literature and a detailed analysis of the work. It also helps other readers to learn something about the new author and books that have catch attention. The goal of the reviewer is to act rationally, logically and emotionally on the reader. Therefore, the reviewer uses language tools that combine the functions of naming and evaluation, book and colloquial words and constructions. The reviewer must carefully substantiate his opinion with the use of an analysis, including arguments.

There are several rules for writing a good book review. Firstly, you do not need to make a detailed retelling. After that it will be uninteresting to read the book itself. One of the criteria for a weak review is rightly considered substitution of analysis and interpretation of the text by retelling it.

Secondly, you need to disclose your understanding of the title of the book. Every familiarization with a new book begins with a title, which you interpret in the process of reading. The name of a good work is always multivalued; it is a kind of symbol, a metaphor.

Thirdly, an analysis of the composition can give much for understanding and interpreting the text. You should think which compositional techniques (antithesis, hyperbola, etc.) are used in the work. This will help to penetrate the author’s intention. Think about which parts you can divide the text into and how they are arranged.

And the last advice – it is important to evaluate the style, originality of the writer, to disassemble the images, the artistic techniques that he uses in his work.  Also, you should find the zest of this writer. Why his style is individual and unique. These rules will be the key to a successful writing of the review. But remember that the review is not necessarily the presence of all of the above components. The most important thing is that the review must be interesting and grammatically correct.

How big should be theoretical part of diploma

When a student understands that the theory for a diploma cannot be written off from the three textbooks, it does not work, he is visited by a brilliant idea: maybe someone will write all this for me? Will shovel 30-50 scientific works, analyze, summarize, arrange links, draw conclusions and achieve high uniqueness? If your plans do not include immersion in the ocean of wisdom and struggle with anti-plagiarism, if you are caught by the furious theme of the thesis and the corrosive scientific adviser, the simplest way to solve problems is to order the theoretical part of the diploma.

In the structure of the degree research, the theoretical part can occupy two positions:

1) to be one of the chapters (the second, of course – practical);

2) equal to the main part (in other words, the main part is completely a theory, there is no practical chapter).

In the event that in the main part there is both a theoretical and a practical chapter, then the theory always should be first. In the theoretical chapter, the  student has theoretical positions, according to the basis for practical research. These provisions the author of the thesis formulate on the basis of work with scientific literature.

If the theory take place of the main part, usually, in addition to scientific literature, sources of main information (documents, archival materials, etc.) are also used. In this case, within the main part, the student needs to demonstrate the ability to open the topic and introduce something new into science, relying on the works of guys before, and on the analysis of primary sources.

Keep in your mind  that the theoretical part of the thesis cannot be written from the  textbooks, encyclopedias.

Why is the theory written? Many students who fail trying to write a theory and admit monstrous errors in writing it easily cope with this task as soon as they understand the meaning of writing the theoretical part of the thesis:

– detailed study of the object you are writing about;

– reflection of the discussion aspect of the topic;

– analysis of different idea;

– unique formation of a theoretical concept;

– a logical way out to the practical part of the thesis.

A simple compilation of other people’s works is not the aim of writing the theoretical part of the diploma. Simply put, it’s not necessary for anyone – it’s not an abstract. Your goal is to create an understandable, logical theoretical basis.

What is ancillary pointers in the master’s thesis

Auxiliary indexes are an optional part of the master’s thesis, so students do not always pay attention to it. When it comes to drawing up this element and its design, the undergraduates can face certain difficulties. Most of the authors and essays of the writers of master’s studies remember pointer at the last moment, therefore they need effective recommendations on these issues. They can be found in this article. Why do we need help in the master’s thesis? Each of us came across auxiliary indexes from school when leafing through encyclopedias or teaching aids, but this element does not always attract our attention. At the end of sources with a large amount of information, a very often list of key concepts or names that occur in the text, with the indication of pages. This is done so that the reader can easily find the information that interests him. Auxiliary indexes can be compared to a hyperlink on the Internet, only this immediately sends the reader to the required material, and the book still has to be displayed. The auxiliary index in the master’s thesis performs the same functions as in the scientific manuals, helping to easily navigate the content of the work. They post it after the applications or in their place.

Types of auxiliary indexes

What kinds of helper signs exist? In master’s studies, the most common are the following indexes: alphabetical-subject (a list of the main terms that occur in the text of the master’s degree with the pages on which they are located); name index (another name is a name index) – a list of your own names (most often personal) in alphabetical order.

These types have both general requirements for registration, and some features. For the competent compilation of pointers to the master’s work, you should remember about these rules: The index consists of headings, they need to include the headings, sub-headings and page numbers on which the declared element is located. Forming the name of the rubric, preference should be given to the noun and adjective, other parts of speech are used less often. The names of headings and subtitles use the nominative case of singular nouns. Indirect cases can be used if the nouns are after the adjectives, and the plural if the concept requires it. The number of page numbers of one heading should be limited to the 10th, if you exceed this value, it will be difficult and uncomfortable to work with the index.

Comparative essay writing guide

Comparative characteristics – one of the most popular types of school essays today. In fact, this essay-reasoning, based on comparing two characters from one or different works. Comparative characteristics often help us to see new, seemingly famous characters. In the introduction to this composition, we define the problem that we will work on, because it is not important for us to compare in and of itself. Comparison of characters is only a way of a deeper understanding of the work, comprehension of the author’s intention, the way of solving some acute problem, etc. Comparative characteristics in any case cannot be turned into a retelling – to tell first about one, then about another hero. The comparison must necessarily take place in parallel, and the two heroes must be compared for the same characteristics or in similar (similar) situations. Dividing the comparison into a series of smaller comparisons, you can move after the text, analyzing the episodes and comparing our characters (while not ignoring the problem posed!). Let’s say we compare: the first appearance of the hero; portrait; living environment; relationship with people close to him, with society; behavior in similar situations; the author’s attitude to the hero, and so on.

Here, by the way, is a plan of your composition.

Analysis of the text, strokes to the portrait, “talking” details, speech – this will be our arguments. Pay special attention to those artistic means by which the author depicts his hero. These can be comparisons, epithets, features of vocabulary relating to the hero, details that create mood. In an artwork, nothing happens by chance. Comparing different characters, we sometimes find their similarity, and vice versa: in outwardly similar heroes – a deep difference. Building the composition of the comparative characteristic, remember that in the beginning of the composition it is always better to dwell on the similarity of the characters, because the main thing after all is their difference. But the “reverse” composition is also possible: from external differences to deep inner similarity. Correctly (i.e., interestingly, effectively) to build an essay you will always be helped by that particular “pair” with which you work. Comparing, pay attention to the fact that the main character is hero (heroes) or secondary, in place, which occupy the characters in the composition of the work. Sometimes the hero is given by the author static, and you may become the best essay writer. It is very important to note the dynamics of the image, that is, how the character changes (and changes) throughout the entire work of art.